Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

Tonight we'll learn something about the next four years in America

The Senate will vote this evening on the nomination of Christian authoritarian Pete Hegseth to be Secretary of Defense.  All the media blather has focused on the fact that he is a drunk and a philanderer, although these are the least relevant facts about him given his actual views.  Of course, he is a drunk and a philanderer:  his Christian authoritarian tendencies are a massive reaction formation for a psyche in disarray.  If the Senate rejects him, there is some hope.  If the Senate does not reject him....

Serbia facing a "general strike"

Here.  University students are centrally involved, and one was injured recently when a car rammed student protesters.  The University of Belgrade has issued a strong statement.  Comments are open for those who have more information.

Lawyer/philosopher Ken Levy, a law professor at Louisiana State, removed from classroom pending investigation...

...for "making political comments" in class.  There's not much detail here.  We know the Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry has open contempt for the First Amendment and academic freedom, but we also don't know what the remarks were and whether or not they were relevant to the class.  (Professor Levy teaches criminal law and constitutional law, both subjects that often make contemporaneous political events relevant.)  Recall that the AAUP definition of academic freedom in teaching states that, "Teachers are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing their subject, but they should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matter which has no relation to their subject."  If the Louisiana Governor were not an authoritarian wannabe, one might be willing to give LSU the benefit of the doubt here.  We'll have to see what information actually comes to light.

ADDENDUM:  There's a bit more detail here, but not much: 

[I]n a classroom of about 82 students, Levy was teaching a class about police and public interactions. His attorney Jill Craft says students took issue with his comments in the confines of teaching the First Amendment.

Craft says a student recorded the lecture and Levy’s now been removed for making political comments, though what those comments were is unclear.

Clearly many "political" comments could be relevant and appropriate in a discussion of police interactions with the public, and the First Amendment.  That a student recorded the class is, of course, creepy.

The universe is unknowable

Philosopher JB Manchak discusses.  Curious whether other philosophers of science concur?

Most-cited Anglophone philosophy articles within 10 years of their publication

Interesting data from philosopher Brian Weatherson, and tracks rather well my own informal sense of whose work has been important in recent English-speaking philosophy.  (The faculty represented also track rather well the top philosophy PhD programs!)

Did Trump just end affirmative action at universities (including private ones)?

In the flurry of execcutive orders by the monster child, I missed this one; as CHE explains:

Decades of higher-ed hiring and employment practices aimed at avoiding discrimination could be upended after President Trump late Tuesday rescinded the Equal Employment Opportunity order signed in 1965 by President Lyndon B. Johnson.

The order applies to federal contractors and likely includes the majority of colleges that receive federal financial aid or other federal funding....

The president’s action also takes aim at private colleges with DEI commitments. It orders all federal agencies to identify “the most egregious and discriminatory DEI practitioners” in their jurisdiction, including higher-education institutions with endowments of $1 billion or more. Each agency is ordered to identify nine potential cases that could be targets of civil-compliance investigations. The goal, the order states, was to “encourage the private sector to end illegal discrimination and preferences, including DEI.”

The now-revoked 1965 measure signed by LBJ had required federal contractors to “formulate affirmative action plans, develop plans to identify job groups where there are underrepresented groups, and come up with plans to address that underrepresentation in ways that are consistent with Title VII,” the federal law banning race, sex, and other forms of discrimination, said Scott Schneider, a prominent employment lawyer who advises colleges on discrimination and other matters.

“My two big takeaways are that all of the affirmative-action planning and report work being done on college campuses likely needs to stop under this executive order,” Schneider said. “Not only do colleges no longer have an obligation to pursue affirmative-action plans, I think this would prohibit it.”

An exception, he said, is likely to be colleges’ legal obligations toward disabled people and veterans.

(Related, earlier discussion here.)

"Explanation in Biology" by Lauren Ross...

...is currently available for free from Cambridge Elements!

Stipends for philosophy PhD students at top programs in the U.S.?

Previous discussions on the blog have noted the bad funding situation for PhD students in philosophy in Canada.  The situation in the U.S., where many (but certainly not all) of the top programs are private (all are public in Canada), is more complex.  In 2023-24, Princeton and Yale were offering stipends of $50,000, Chicago was offering $45,000, Berkeley was offering $40,000, and NYU was offering less than Berkeley (I forget the number).   A graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin recently wrote to me:

Currently, incoming students are offered guaranteed funding for either five years, with the possibility of a sixth year depending on good standing, or for six years, with a possible seventh year. This funding is tied to our employment as Teaching Assistants (TAs) or Assistant Instructors (AIs), leaving students with the expectation of teaching throughout the entire program. Once a student defends their prospectus—usually around their third year—and completes a required teaching seminar, they are eligible to teach their own classes as AIs. This teaching opportunity is marketed to us not only as a chance to gain solo teaching experience but also as an opportunity to earn more money. However, the salary increase is minimal. While the annual TA salary is $21,000, the AI salary is $22,500....Moreover, only students in their first and second years (those who are TAing) receive summer support. This summer stipend is $5,000, which barely covers the three months during which no salary is provided. The rest only receive funding for 9 months of the year.

This leaves students in a difficult position, as they must either take on a side job during the summer months to support themselves or take out loans. The first option is not feasible for international students, as their visas prohibit them from seeking outside employment in the U.S. 

As longtime readers may recall, I taught at UT Austin from 1995 until 2008, and it was also true then that graduate funding was not very competitive, and I am sorry to learn (from this student's report) that things have not changed.  This is a perennial problem at public universities, I fear.  Many years ago, Steve Stich and I were external reviewers for the CUNY Graduate Center's philosophy PhD program which then, like now, boasted a very strong faculty; but back then, the graduate student support was totally inadequate (most PhD students were teaching 3 or 4 courses per semester from the start of their graduate education!).  The Graduate Center, much to its credit, and the success of the program, improved support substantially.  

As another reference point:  when I quite my job as a lawyer at a big NYC law firm in 1988 (salary:  $65,000), it was to take a $10,000 year PhD fellowship at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (about $27,000 today)--which was, as I recall, better than the graduate support at Yale.

Here is the question for readers (either faculty or PhD students):  what kind of aid packages does your program offer (typically, exceptionally, etc.) to incoming PhD students?  Are these packages adequate for the cost of living students face?  As with everything else in the neoliberal order, the discrepancies between the private and public sectors appear to be growing (e.g., 21K at UT Austin, 50K at Princeton).

Students must post with a valid email address (which will not appear); faculty must post with a full name and valid email address (again, the email will not appear).

Do UK academics need to provide their passport to be an external examiner in the UK?

Political philosopher David Owen (at the University of Southampton in the UK) posted about this topic on FB, and then kindly offered to draft something for the blog, since it seemed to me this is important information to get into circulation for UK academics.  Professor Owen's informative post is below the fold:

Trump and higher education, once again

Informative interview with Jeremy Young from PEN America.  (Earlier.)

Should book authors consent to having generative AI train on their work?

Philosopher Elliott Sober posed a version of this question to me via email, and thought it would make a useful topic for discussion.  I agree.  What do readers think?  What are the pros and cons?  What decisions have you as an author made when approached by publishers about this?   Please note your academic discipline if it is not philosophy.

The monster child's first day with political power

Of all the stupid and venal things he did--declaring a fake "national emergency" at the Southern border, withdrawing from the Paris Climate accords, withdrawing from the World Health Organization--the most ominous was pardoning all those convicted for participation in the stormtrooper riot on January 6, 2021, including those convicted of violent crimes and seditious conspiracy.  What this signals, unmistakably, is that Trump has no intention of permitting a peaceful transfer of power in January 2029, unless it is to his anointed successor.  It may also signal his intent to hang on to power himself.

PGR in the real world, an ongoing saga

Professor James Weatherall, Chair of Logic & Philosophy of Science at the University of California, Irvine:  "The Philosophical Gourmet is widely acknowledged as the leading reputational ranking for philosophy Ph.D. programs in the English-speaking world."   It's a shame it can't attract better critics, but at least we know why it attracts even the feeble ones.

Blast from the past: How to write a cover letter for the U.S. job market

Back in 2011, with reader discussion.

The "true and final value" of philosophy

The next time the Dean asks, you can point them to this amusing, self-described "rant."

Millsaps College fired a faculty member for expressing a political opinion to students in an email

FIRE has the details, and I hope they will sue the college.

(Thanks to John Casey for the pointer.)

Today the monster child is sworn in as President

What can one say?  America is in very bad shape.  The person becoming President isn't fit to do any responsible, adult job (not even Mafia boss, his lifelong role model position).  Who would even let him mind the kids or the dog?  To make matters worse, he is surrounded by some not-so-crypto fascists.   We learned last time that the country can carry on reasonably well even when the President is an incompetent, ignorant and malevolent buffoon.  Will we be so lucky this time around?  And how will it end?

Meanwhile, the NYT compiles a list of the monster child's remarks about his "enemies,", confirming, yet again, that projection is the core of his psychic armory, since everything he says about his "enemies" applies entirely to him:  he is the one who “should be prosecuted for what []he has done to our country"; he is the “washed up Creepster...a lowlife who should be in jail, money seized, for disseminating...highly Classified information";  he is, in fact, "the most corrupt president in the history of the United States of America," along with his Trump "crime family"; he is "a sleazebag and traitor, and should be prosecuted for the damage he has done to our Country!”; and he is the real "enemy from within."

Great moment in obscure rock 'n' roll: Woody's Truck Stop, "People Been Talkin'," 1968

Philadelphia-based blue rock band (with a bit of Grateful Dead flavor as well), it started in 1966, and early line-ups included Todd Rundgren, who left to form the Nazz before Woody's Truck Stop's first and only album from 1968 (you can learn ore than you want about the band and its history here); this is the lead track from that album:

 

Still more on the Franke case at Columbia Law School

Here.

Petition in support of fired philosophy faculty at Portland State

Here.  I have signed, and I encourage readers to sign as well.

"The Metaphysics of Talking to Aliens"

Who knew there was such a subject?  Philosopher Matti Eklund discusses.

ADDENDUM: Needless to say, the quoted title, above, was not Professor Eklund's doing, but it does catch attention!

2024 in review, 4th quarter: October, November, December

MOVING TO FRONT FROM DECEMBER 27

October

Einstein vs. Bergson on the nature of time

Department of Education's OCR creates massive exception for faculty's contractual right to academic freedom

Do your undergraduates have trouble reading whole books? (with extensive, and depressing, comments from readers)

Three models of a PhD program faculty:  Princeton, MIT, Pittsburgh

AAUP is now irrelevant to the fight for academic freedom

The impending Trump disaster

Idealism and realism about philosophy and its role

David Lewis on his approach to philosophy, on his education, etc.

AI is "dumber than a cat"

On being cancelled in philosophy

"Computer plainly can't think"

November

Election post-mortem, 2024

The new Republican initiative for higher education in states they control:  "Western Civilization" centers

The study of philosophy in law schools and JD/PhD programs, 2024 edition

Jaime Edwards and I talk about our Marx book

How Trump can attack higher education: a  guide

A note about Indiana University, Bloomington and the PGR

December

Philosopher Laurie Paul profiled at The New Yorker

I've moved from Twitter/X to Bluesky

An interview with T.M. Scanlon about his moral philosophy

Moving from at-home writing assignments to in-class assignments to prevent AI cheating

What should be done?

College Cost Reduction Act, coming soon

The quiet bloodbath developing at Portland State University

Specialty rankings, and how to use them

 

 

Please do not write to me from anonymous "proton" email or similar addresses

I ignore these emails, or I ask the sender to communicate from a real email address if the issue seems important.  I promise to protect, as I have for a quarter-century now, the identities of faculty or students who are writing to me about matters where they worry they are at risk of retaliation.  I may not post on the blog about these issues, but I will not reveal your identity.  I get these emails with some frequency (one or two a month), and they are not productive.  Thank you.

UPDATE:  Just to clarify, most of the anonymous emails I get are from proton addresses, but not all (occasionally they come from gmail).  

What articles in general jurisprudence from the first quarter of the 21st-century should you read...

...to be current in the subject.

In Memoriam: Paul Benacerraf (1931-2025)

Professor Benacerraf, who was emeritus at Princeton (where he was educated and spent his entire career), was a leading figure in philosophy of mathematics, and also supervised many of Princeton's best-known PhD graduates over a half-century on the faculty.  Comments are open for remembrances from those who knew Professor Benacerraf or for those who wish to comment on the significance of his work.

(Thanks to Stephen Stich for the information).

"Colonialism and Fascism"

Videos of Jason Stanley's lecture course at the Kyvi School of Economics on this topic are now available online here.

2024 in review, 3rd quarter: July, August, September

MOVING TO FRONT FROM DEC 26

July

Sleepwalking into disaster:  the response to learning Emperor Biden has no clothes

"How to Cabin the Realist Indeterminacy Thesis:  On Green, Positivism, and the Sources of Law"

An interview with Neuhouser on Rousseau and Amour-Propre

"Foucault as a Kind of Realist:  Genealogical Critique and the Debunking of the Human Sciences"

Hobart & William Smith Politics Professor wrongfully suspended will return to the classroom this fall

August

Philosophy & Public Affairs successor journal

Resources in philosophy of work and labor and related areas

Philosopher's Annual, top ten papers from 2023

September

Top 50 Universities by membership in the National Academy of Sciences

Is it a problem that there are so few political "conservatives" in the American academy? 

The unusual case of Barrington Jones:  from elite philosophy to plumbing

Academic freedom abolished at Penn

"My dinner with Nozick"

Why is this race so close?  There is no mystery

Nietzsche's moral anti-realism

Leslie Green on jurisprudence and its relation to history

"China, Feminism, and the Legacy of Confucius"

Philosopher Sor-hoon Tan comments.  This seems to me an optimistic take, but perhaps it's right.

2024 in review, 2nd quarter: April, May, June

MOVING TO FRONT FROM DECEMBER 24, 2024, FOR THOSE WHO MAY HAVE MISSED IT

April

Marx's critique of Stirner

"On Gutting the Liberal Arts"

"Law is a Moral Practice" (it isn't, actually, except sometimes by accident)

Stipends for Canadian Ph.D. students

Refereeing frequency, redux (see also)

Cambridge University college dismises philosophy Fellow because his views conflict with DEI

Campus protests and excessive police responses

May

Most Black Americans want to increase police presence and spending on police

Some thoughts about the "encampment" at the University of Chicago (and its end)

The Israel/Gaza catastrophe--plus the question of "academic boycotts"

All editors (except EIC) resigned from Philosophy & Public Affairs, and will start a new journal (the EIC resigned later)

Why are philosophy departments so good about disclosing job placement for PhD graduates?

June

A long interview about Nietzsche and free will

Metablog redux

Philosopher and logician Warren Goldfarb makes TMZ celebrity gossip site

The end of academic freedom in Florida?  The courts will decide

2016 deja vu all over again

 

Lateral moves/retirements since the 2024 Philosophical Gourmet Report: 2024-25 edition

In addition to the separate posts announcing (generally tenured) faculty moves, I will keep a running list of all lateral moves (and retirements and deaths) not reflected in the faculty lists for the 2024 PGR (some moves that took place after the 2024 PGR were reflected in the faculty list, because the editors knew of them--the ones listed here were not reflected in the faculty lists evaluators saw).  I will start a new list for each academic year, so that the list does not get unwieldy.    I will move this to the front periodically, putting recent additions in bold.  Untenured lateral moves will be noted as such, otherwise the move is with tenure.  A lateral move is one from one tenure-stream position to another either into or out of a program offering the PhD or terminal MA.  In addition I will list retirements and also deaths of non-emeritus faculty.  Please e-mail me with additions or corrections.

Santiago Amaya (moral psychology, philosophy of action) from the University of Los Andes (Colombia) to Rice University.

Jc Beall (philosophical logic; philosophy of logic, mathematics & language; metaphysics) had to rescind (for personal reasons) acceptance of an offer from the National University of Singapore, so remains at the University of Notre Dame.

Jeremy Fantl (epistemology) from the University of Calgary to Ohio State University.

Michael Friedman (Kant, philosophy of science, 20th-century philosophy) has taken emeritus status at Stanford University.

Graciella de Pierris (early modern philosophy) died in fall 2024.

Lawrence Shapiro (philosophy of mind & psychology) will retire from the University of Wisconsin, Madison at the end of the 2024-25 academic year.

Stewart Shapiro (philosophy of mathematics, philosophical logic) retired from Ohio State University in 2024, but continues to teach half-time at both Ohio State and teh University of Connectcut, Storrs (he was listed as full-time, and not emeritus, at OSU in the fall 2024 PGR).

Changes in the senior ranks typically affect specialty rankings, although can also affect the "overall" rankings (e.g., without de Pierris and Friedman, I would expect Stanford to drop out of the top 15 but remain in the top 20).

The Katherine Franke case at Columbia Law School

More details here.  As usual (recall Norman Finkelstein and Steven Salaita), vigorous support for the Palestinians and vigorous criticism of Israel waives ordinary First Amendment and academic freedom rights in America.

"Fundamentalism is the mortal enemy of all civilized humanity"

Thus spake RAWA, and here's a domestic case in point.

Philosophy faculty at Portland State University protest proposed termination of non-tenure-stream faculty

Their letter to University leadership (earlier coverage):

Dear President Cudd, Provost Chabon, Dean Rosenstiel, Associate Dean Carlson, and Associate Dean Oslund,

We, the faculty of the Department of Philosophy, are writing to request the immediate reversal of the decision to terminate the positions of our colleagues Dr. Brian Elliott, Dr. Monica Mueller, and Dr. Albert Spencer III. This opaquely-reasoned decision jeopardizes the Department of Philosophy’s long-term viability, its ability to offer a diverse curriculum, as well as high-profile community-facing programs such as the Oregon High School and Middle School Ethics Bowls.

The elimination of faculty has been framed as “due to changes in their departments’ programmatic and curricular needs.” However, decisions have apparently been based on an analysis that targets departments with too many classes of fewer than 12 students. This makes the Dean’s Office’s decision unclear since, according to its own analysis, shared with the CLAS Curriculum Committee, Philosophy does not have a particularly large number of classes with fewer than 11 students. Compared to all CLAS departments, it is below both the mean and median in low-enrolling classes. Nonetheless, the College’s strategy has been to eliminate philosophy adjuncts, followed by eliminating non-tenure track faculty, with the idea that tenure-track faculty can step in to meet curricular needs.

The Dean’s Office is operating under the rationale that faculty are fungible. Dr. Elliott, Dr. Mueller, and Dr. Spencer each teach 9 courses yearly. Together, they taught 910 students last academic year for a total of 3,640 SCH, an average of 33 students per class. All three are known as inspirational teachers and mentors to our majors. Moreover, they each teach classes that other colleagues in the department cannot.

Their classes include central courses for the Race & Ethnic Studies requirement, such as Philosophy of Race, Indigenous Philosophy, Queer Philosophy, and Latinx Philosophy. They also include Philosophy of Education, the Philosophy for Children Capstone, and the Philosophy Summer Camp for high school students. Other classes include the Metamorphosis First Year Inquiry and Feminist Philosophy, taught at the Coffee Creek Correctional Facility for women. These faculty also are primarily responsible for teaching high enrolling general education classes, such as Environmental Ethics, Philosophy of Sex and Love, Philosophy of Work and Leisure, and Philosophy of Sport.

Over and above their high teaching load, our colleagues have produced a remarkable amount of scholarship. Over the last seven years while at PSU, they have (taken together) published three books in major presses, with a further two books forthcoming in 2025, on topics such as urban revitalization, climate change, and our gaming culture. These publications support PSU’s effort to be a top research institution, and allow PSU to garner an international reputation as a place for high-quality and timely research. 

2024 in review, 1st quarter: January, February, March

MOVING TO FRONT FROM DECEMBER 23, FOR THOSE WHO MAY HAVE MISSED IT DURING THE HOLIDAY BREAK

January

The financial future of UK universities (outside Oxbridge)

Two PhDs in philosophy, but in different areas?

Data on undergraduate philosophy majors in the U.S. over the last two decades

How long to wait for a journal before withdrawing an article under submission?

Timothy Williamson did not like Philip Kitcher's "What's the Use of Philosophy?"

Most Cited Anglophone books on Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Nietzsche

February

"Science does not describe reality" (with a fabulous set of reader comments)

The growth of PPE

How Trump thinks, redux

Yale faculty in favor of Yale being a university

March

The "literature review" as "symbolic violence" and "epistemic theft"

Are there too many "elderly" faculty?

More on "redundant" publications (with reader discussion)

How does holding a PhD in another field affect PhD in philosophy admissions?

John K. Wilson is not a reliable supporter of academic freedom

What is it like to be "manic"?

On retiring

"Not everything is about gender"

St. Norbert College's mass firing of humanities junior faculty

Philosopher Leif Wenar on "effective" (i.e., short-term, measurable) altruism

Matthew Kramer on "Legal Rights and Moral Rights"...

...is free from CUP until early February!

Fantl from Calgary to Ohio State

Jeremy Fantl (epistemology), Professor of Philosophy at the University of Calgary, has accepted the O'Donnell Professorship in the Department of Philosophy at Ohio State University, where he will start in fall 2025.

Great moment in obscure rock 'n' roll: Mint Tatoo, "Wrong Way Girl," 1969

Several former members of Blue Cheer formed Mint Tatoo in 1968, and produced one album, from which this catchy tune comes:

Feel free to post links to other Mink Tatoo or obscure Blue Cheer numbers in the comments.

The wildfire catastrophe in Los Angeles

MOVING TO FRON FROM JANUARY 9--SEE ESP. THE VERY INFORMATIVE COMMENT FROM PHILOSOPHER CHRIS HITCHCOCK, BELOW--MORE COMMENTS WELCOME

Good luck to readers in the Los Angeles area; from the media reports, it looks very frightening indeed.  Comments are open for anyone who wants to post information or updates.

PGR section on terminal MA programs...

...has been updated.  See also the data on placement from MA programs compiled by Gil Hersch at Virginia Tech.  (Do read the comments on the latter, which note some limitations of the data.)

In Memoriam: Robert Paul Wolff (1933-2025)

MOVING TO FRONT FROM JANUARY 7--UPDATED

I was sorry to learn that Professor Wolff died last night.  He was, of course, well-known to readers of this blog for his many trenchant insights into contemporary events, to which I often linked, as well as his fascinating autobiography, to which we linked often a decade ago.  Professor Wolff began his career as a Kant scholar, but became best-known as a political philosopher, with his classic defense of anarchism in 1970, and books on Marx and Rawls, among other figures and topics.  He taught at the University of Chicago, Columbia University and, for most of his career, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, first in the Philosophy Department and then in the Afro-American Studies Department.  Comments are open for remembrances from those who knew Professor Wolff, or for those who wish to comment on the significance of his work.  I am, as it happens, teaching Marx later this afternoon (a subject on which I learned much from Professor Wolff), but will add some comments of my own in the coming days.

UPDATE:  An informative obituary here.

A 1962 lecture by Ernest Nagel on the "current issues" in philosophy of science

Here.   Curious to hear what contemporary philosophers of science think of his characterization of philosophy of science.

(Thanks to Richard Marshall for the pointer.)

In Memoriam: Lawrence Sklar (1938-2024)

Professor Sklar, who was emeritus at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, where he spent most of his career, died last year.  He was a leading contributor to the philosophy of science and physics, but he was remarkably erudite about almost everything in philosophy (including even phenomenology).  He joined the Michigan faculty in 1968, after brief stints teaching at Swarthmore and Princeton, where he took his PhD.  The Michigan memorial notice is here, and it captures him well!  Comments are open for remembrances from those who knew Professor Sklar, or for those who wish to comment on the significance of his work.  I'll add my own recollections in the coming days.

Trump is not even President yet, and he's threatening military force against Greenland and Panama...

...and economic coercion against Canada.  We're in for four years of this childish imbecile!  The threats against Canada prompted these striking observations from philosopher Rachel Barney (at the University of Toronto), which she kindly gave permission to share here:

Trump is now promising to use 'economic force, not military' to annex Canada. In response to a question from a reporter which treated those as perfectly sane, normal alternative plans a President might have.

I overcame a revulsion of many years standing and for the first time clicked on the link and heard his voice. And it's by no means the demented word salad I'd expected. All the economic grievances are familiar rightwing talking points, and the underlying theory is just what many on both sides have thought since before Confederation, that the border is just an economic impediment and union the rational, mutually beneficial option. And I have zero doubt that a US government which sought to do so, and didn't mind its own people being collateral damage, could inflict so much damage that a lot of Canadians would change their preferences fast and cry uncle. We're not Finland, never have been.

 

There's no legal or constitutional path forward to annexation, but with a bit of brutality it would be easy to create enough of an internal constituency for a US military action to be colorable as 'aid to the oppressed Albertans' or enforcement of some forcibly imposed trade deal, or emergency help or whatever. The Conservative political leadership would stampede each other for quisling roles. In short it's absolutely a doable project, and I would imagine that saner people than Trump have been looking at water resource projections and gaming out scenarios for years.

It is really really bad that so many Canadians are still being blithe about this (looking at you, Toronto Star, and your creepy new owners). We need to get past the denial stage stat. The most obvious practical response is to rally round some Liberal leadership candidate who gets it, and has what it takes to lead a kind of National Patriotic Front of all but the right. I would rejoin the Party for that.

Curious to hear from Canadian readers what they make of this latest craziness, and whether they agree with Professor Barney's assessment.  Signed comments (full name, valid email address [which will not appear]) will be strongly preferred.

Friends "without pressure"

Philosopher Mark Phelan comments.

"Cunk on Life"

Philomena Cunk is a well-known (in Britain) comedian, and her latest, very funny "documentary" includes some brief interviews with philosophers, including Peter Kail and Ruth Chang.  (Peter Kail's cat, it turns out, is an existentialist.)

ADDENDUM:  I should add that you can see this "documentary" on Netflix currently.

Colorado Summer Seminar in Philosophy for 2025

Philosopher David Boonin (Colorado) tells me the topic for 2025 will be "Laws, Markets, and Conventions: Specific issues to be discussed may involve debates about the nature or normative status of various legal institutions, controversies about specific legal prohibitions, questions about science and the laws of nature, concerns about inappropriate market commodification, puzzles about consumer boycotts and ethical divestment, questions about the merits of capitalism and private property, and debates on the role of convention or social construction in these and other domains. Readings will cover a wide range of philosophical subfields and include both contemporary and historical sources.”

There are more details here:   https://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/events/summer-seminar

I've heard good things about these summer seminars over the years, so I encourage undergraduate readers, especially those thinking they might be interested in graduate school, to take a look.

To control your self, control your environment

Philosopher Matthew Haug discusses.

Blast from the past: Why study history of philosophy?

Back in 2011, with reader discussion.

The "stormtrooper riot" at the Capitol was four years ago today

A few posts from that day, the day after, Trump's attempt at damage control, and what the stormtrooper riot portends.   (I always thought my label, "stormtrooper riot" was a more apt description than "insurrection.")  The big question, as I remarked previously, will be what happens after the 2028 election.

Jimmy Carter: his "private virtues were public vices"

An intelligent assessment of his life and career:  he was the Democrat who initiated the retreat from the New Deal consensus, one then destroyed by Reagan.