Jesus didn't rise from the dead, because no one rises from the dead

So why is a secular newspaper running an interview that treats this as a serious possibility? It's one thing for a Church newspaper to feature such an interview, but the New York Times?  Maybe they should now run an interview with a Hume scholar on Hume on miracles and the comparative worthlessness of "testimony" in this context.

(Thanks to Howard Berman for the pointer.)