MOVING TO FRONT, ORIGINALLY POSTED JANUARY 6--CONTINUES TO GENERATE INTERESTING COMMENTS (READERS MAY DISCUSSION THE RECENT LINKED CRITIQUES HERE AS WELL)
When it comes to Rousseau and French Enlightenment, not at all. Their mistakes conform to Graeber's ideological agenda, however, which has to raise a red flag about the rest of their story. I'm curious whether readers have seen scholarly assessments of the archaeological claims in the book?
