Jenny Saul (Sheffield) does this all the time: "important" doesn't mean well-argued, insightful, philosophically creative or significant, it means "expresses the correct views accepted by all right-minded people who share my epistemic bubble." That's why I'm sure she won't note the "important" reply to Professor Bettcher's rather weak piece.
ADDENDUM: Now she's at least linked to Stock's response, though it was not deemed "important" of course.
Recent Comments