So with more than 160 votes in our poll from last week, here's the top ten:
| 1. European Journal of Philosophy (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices) |
| 2. Journal of the History of Philosophy loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 80–37 |
| 3. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 75–40, loses to Journal of the History of Philosophy by 64–45 |
| 4. British Journal for the History of Philosophy loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 91–26, loses to Philosophy & Phenomenological Research by 57–48 |
| 5. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 87–26, loses to British Journal for the History of Philosophy by 52–44 |
| 6. Philosophical Review loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 92–21, loses to Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie by 61–32 |
| 7. Inquiry loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 100–10, loses to Philosophical Review by 44–41 |
| 8. History of Philosophy Quarterly loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 101–14, loses to Inquiry by 46–44 |
| 9. Review of Metaphysics loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 92–24, loses to History of Philosophy Quarterly by 46–44 |
| 10. Philosopher's Imprint loses to European Journal of Philosophy by 95–12, loses to Review of Metaphysics by 46–43 |
Note the tight clustering (in terms of vote differentials) outside the "top five." EJP probably should come out on top, though I will say there's been a decline in the quality of the Nietzsche papers they've published in recent years. I probably should have included Journal of the American Philosophical Association, since it has published papers on Continental figures, but it's also still quite a new journal. (The quality at JAPA has also been uneven, it seems to me, but it's still early days.)
Several of these journals publish Continental articles quite infrequently (e.g., Phil Review, PPR), though it is true that when they do publish such articles, they tend to be of good quality.
Recent Comments